MATCH REPORT: Australia v New Zealand

The most hotly anticipated game of this World Cup so far lived up to its billing, as Australia ended a thrilling chase against New Zealand at Bristol with a 5-wicket win, but with just 8 balls remaining.

Chasing 220, Australia were cruising at the halfway stage at 100-2, until 2 wickets in 2 balls from 16-year-old Amelia Kerr in the 34th over put the pressure firmly back on the chasing side.

Ellyse Perry (71) and Alex Blackwell (36*), though, ultimately came together in a 76-run partnership to finish the job for Australia.

It had all started so well for the Kiwis, as a runs-hungry Suzie Bates - playing in her 100th ODI - looked to punish the shorter deliveries from Perry and Megan Schutt early on.

Her opening partner Rachel Priest struggled to get going, waiting until the 6th over to get off the mark with a single through the leg side. She duly became Amanda-Jade Wellington’s first World Cup wicket, walking off with just 8 runs (from 30 balls) to her name.

But that brought Amy Satterthwaite to the crease, and while the world’s number 3-ranked batsman looked unusually out of sorts, having to rely on singles and overthrows to accumulate her 21 runs, she provided good support for Bates, who moved swiftly onto her 23rd ODI 50 (71 balls).

At 85-1 after 22 overs the pair had laid a good foundation, but the introduction of Jess Jonassen to the attack proved disastrous. Her second over of the day saw her trap Satterthwaite LBW and, two balls later, dismiss Katey Martin caught behind - both deceived by the moving ball.

Bates (51) followed two overs later, failing to convert her half-century as Jonassen trapped her plumb in front with a straighter ball.

When Ashleigh Gardner then also removed Sophie Devine cheaply (14 off 30 balls), it left New Zealand 120-5 with 18 overs of their innings still remaining, and in a whole heap of trouble.

But a tremendous rearguard effort from Katie Perkins (52) and Erin Bermingham (35), who piled on a 49-run partnership - Perkins dispatching the ball to all corners of the boundary, and Bermingham deftly lofting the ball over the infield for 2s and 3s - somehow dragged New Zealand up to a competitive total, 33 runs coming off the last 5 overs.

In reply, Australia lost two wickets in the first 20 overs, as both Nicole Bolton (32) and Beth Mooney (26) struggled to keep up with the required rate. Meg Lanning and Perry, though, gradually became more expansive, both giving little hope to the New Zealand bowlers, with Lanning hitting the only six of the day against Bermingham, driving over long-on.

The wobble, when it came, was unexpected, with Kerr - who Lanning had successfully attacked earlier in the innings - removing Lanning and Villani with successive deliveries. What had seemed such a foregone conclusion now became a genuine contest, with Australia still needing 55 runs from the last 10 overs.

Blackwell, though, was the essence of calm from the time she strode to the crease, defending out Kerr’s hat-trick ball, stroking boundaries and rotating the strikes with ease. She eventually finished the match in the 49th over with a single pushed into the off-side, after Perry had departed the previous ball, slogging it straight to Satterthwaite at deep midwicket.

Australia now sit second in the points table behind India, with 3 wins from 3 games, and captain Meg Lanning said that she was pleased with the way things were progressing for her side:

“We’ve started off really well which is important in really big tournaments… We feel like different people are stepping up at different times.”

“All in all I’m pretty happy with the performance. The win was set up by our bowlers. We were able to take wickets at crucial times… There’s some things that we can still keep working on, but it’s nice to keep winning.”

Meanwhile Perry, who today brought up 2000 ODI runs, said that it had been a difficult chase:

“It was a tricky wicket to get in on and coupled with that New Zealand bowled really well. [Kerr’s over] definitely swung the momentum a bit."

"Chasing 5 an over you’re reasonably comfortable to a degree, but it was hard-going.”


  1. NZ's total was about 15 runs short and with Priest looking scratchy, their batting line-up is not as dangerous. It was a competitive performance but not quite outstanding enough to inflict a defeat on the Aussies, who from the highlights video sound like they had the most fans in Bristol.

    I thought Australia bowled well today. Even with Perry periodically misfiring, with Schutt , Jonassen and Gardner doing so consistently well, they don't really need any more pace bowlers. Their batting approach I'm less of a fan of. Unflappable Australia who can chase anything down, are also, to some extent, a not particularly exciting Australia. There were only 38 boundaries in a total of 439 runs here today which seems low to me. No Australia batsman had a strike-rate above 80. This was a workmanlike but maybe to the neutral, slightly uninspiring performance. Australia are great at just doing what is required to win and little more. As a side who wins everything, that's a bit disappointing to me. As the world's top team, I wonder if they should not be doing more to be pushing the game on. It's clear they've been drilled in how to win but in how to entertain? Personally, I preferred England's riskier approach to the chase today where they attacked more and ended up winning with 20 overs left.

    I wonder if any other captain at this world cup other than Lanning would have made a fuss about an opposition captain making a mistake with their call at the toss. That action seems to have triggered the Windies poor showing so far. Some people might call it good captaincy but to me it was Steve Smith-type-stuff, and not really the way to make friends and endear oneself. Anyway that's my little rant out of the way! (Self-analysis: Bitter Englishman trying to goad the Aussies out of their comfort zone ahead of next Sunday!)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog


The Bloggers' Predictions - How did we do?

Who will win WWC17?